logoalt Hacker News

bhoustontoday at 5:18 PM4 repliesview on HN

The fact that political spending is considered free speech in the US gives the rich and already powerful massive sway in the political system, it is basically tiled hard towards them. And then combined with how PACs hide their funding behind names like "Everyday Americans Making the World Better" when really it just wants to lessen online gambling laws for a billion dollar company, is just brutal. US politics is a dystopian future realized.


Replies

arealaccounttoday at 5:39 PM

Even crazier that they sway elections in districts they've never even visited nor intend to ever visit

IAmGraydontoday at 7:57 PM

The decision to allow unlimited political donations in 2010 was certainly one of the worst decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. Care to guess who was behind it? Roberts, Thomas, and Alito. The same corrupt assholes who continue to fuck this country every single time they get the opportunity.

show 2 replies
buellerbuellertoday at 5:30 PM

Enabled yet again, today, by the SCOTUS.

show 1 reply
twoodfintoday at 7:38 PM

Political spending is perhaps the most important kind of free speech.

It cost money to print copies of the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers. The New York Times gets into politics quite a bit and is published by a multi-billion dollar corporation.

Where in the Constitution is that activity protected from the government but the First Amendment?