logoalt Hacker News

StilesCrisistoday at 2:19 PM5 repliesview on HN

Reeks of AI prose past the first paragraph or two. I don't need to know a bot's opinion on how to convince others.


Replies

jannyfertoday at 2:26 PM

Yeah I enjoyed the first bit, then “the one exception” made me go “hey, Claude does this to me all the time” and then it ruined the article for me.

Sol-today at 2:27 PM

Yeah, I also got suspicious and checked it with Pangram. Sadly 100% AI. Perhaps it still has good points, but my heart drops whenever I sniff the AI prose. I can just query Claude or ChatGPT myself, you know?

show 1 reply
satvikpendemtoday at 3:56 PM

It turns out AI writes like that because humans write like this. It seemed like AI to me too but when I read all of it, it definitely does not seem like AI anymore, just the style of self help blog post seem a couple decades ago.

ptmxtoday at 4:06 PM

Yeah, disappointing to see it so highly upvoted. So many tells of AI slop:

> There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic.

> If letting go of the argument sounds like pure loss, here’s the reframe that turns it into a gain.

> The ego is lowered. The defenses are down. The advice lands.

Even if there was some human insight that went into it, the output could be reduced in length by 80+% without any loss of substance.

post-ittoday at 3:50 PM

I thought the same thing. I do think the first section was written or at least edited by hand. The rest could've been an email, so to speak.