logoalt Hacker News

eskatoday at 2:58 PM7 repliesview on HN

It should be illegal to have others purchase what you as a company only licensed and therefore aren’t legally allowed to sell.


Replies

mmh0000today at 3:24 PM

What's funny is that Sony has done this before![0] I've had a personal boycott against Sony products due to this.

  "The feature was controversially removed by Sony since system firmware update 3.21, released on April 1, 2010.[2] A class action lawsuit was filed against Sony on behalf of users, but was dismissed with prejudice in 2011 by a federal judge. The judge stated: "As a legal matter, ... plaintiffs have failed to allege facts or articulate a theory on which Sony may be held liable."[3] However, this decision was overturned in a 2014 appellate court decision[4] finding that plaintiffs had indeed made clear and sufficiently substantial claims. Ultimately, in 2016, Sony settled with users who had installed Linux or had purchased a PlayStation 3 based upon the availability of OtherOS."

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OtherOS
show 4 replies
piltdownmantoday at 3:09 PM

They make it up as they go along. Their 2005 Audio-CD EULA includes provisions purporting to require the immediate deletion of all copies if a user files for personal bankruptcy

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2005/12/summary-claims-against...

show 2 replies
xtractotoday at 4:22 PM

If buying is not owning, piracy is not theft.

show 3 replies
noahbptoday at 3:12 PM

Plenty of people purchase digital movie rentals from Apple, Youtube, etcetera because they know they will watch it once, and the lower price in exchange for a temporary license is acceptable to them. I don't think banning this is pro-consumer.

It should, however, be illegal to tell your customers that they are purchasing/buying media without explicit "Rent" language (which implies a non-expiring license) when you do not yourself have the right to grant non-expiring licenses.

show 2 replies
404mmtoday at 3:16 PM

I bet there’s a class action coming.

And Sony made it easy for them too by using this verbiage: “previously purchased content”

show 1 reply
cryptonymtoday at 3:01 PM

Agree... if they want to sell it, parent company must agree on forever licenses for each user. Regardless of reselling license getting cancelled.

throwaway87543today at 4:40 PM

Studio Canal directly got paid for each individual purchase. It isn't all on Sony, Studio Canal sold a product then took it away.

show 2 replies