logoalt Hacker News

Aachentoday at 5:01 PM3 repliesview on HN

Exoplanets also aren't planets. Some things just seem to have definitions with a history that get applied to new discoveries that don't fall within the definition. Distinguishing random rocks in space from planets was done by requiring planets to orbit around the sun, and so planets elsewhere cannot be called planets no matter that it's 1:1 the same thing. Biology probably has a similar history of trying to draw a line somewhere between what was created and what evolved to be part of the 'natural' world


Replies

oliverx0today at 5:06 PM

Exoplanets are planets. Also, for clarification, biology is not defined as “the study of things produced exclusively by natural evolution.” Synthetic biology works with biological components and living systems (DNA, proteins, regulatory networks, cells and organisms). It differs from much traditional biology mainly in its constructive, engineering-oriented approach. Synthetic systems are often built precisely to test hypotheses about how natural biological systems function. Claiming it is not biology is wrong IMO.

show 2 replies
jibaltoday at 8:19 PM

> Exoplanets also aren't planets.

That is flatly wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet

"An exoplanet or extrasolar planet is a planet outside the Solar System."

show 1 reply
hparadiztoday at 5:12 PM

> Exoplanets also aren't planets.

Imagine writing this.

show 2 replies