logoalt Hacker News

unleadedyesterday at 8:01 PM4 repliesview on HN

As someone who doesnt use these tools, why does every AI company need their own version of Claude Code? Is there more to it than vendor lock-in?


Replies

ambicapteryesterday at 8:19 PM

"Quality" of the harness matters a lot to the user experience, and the construction of the harness will depend on the behavior/quirks of the underlying model. So, if you're using Claude Code, you can expect it to work best with Anthropic models, and expect other model-makers to want you to use the harness they've developed.

But mostly vendor lock-in, I imagine.

cheesecakegoodtoday at 3:18 AM

There are different grades of vendor lock-in. There's mechanical lock-in (which is a thing, like .claude folders) and economic lock-in but then we don't pay enough attention to behavioral lock-in. Habit is powerful, and if you can habituate users into a certain flow, change feels bad and they are more likely to stay.

computerextoday at 2:48 AM

Why not? They are relatively easy to make so why not. Even I made one: https://github.com/computerex/z

theredleftyesterday at 8:02 PM

implementing their own version of steganographic monitoring lol

show 1 reply