alt Hacker News> Why do you think the more critical scientists are more correct?
I am not qualified to make a judgement here, the point is following the process is better than jumping the gun on principle.
It literally doesn’t matter if it’s eventually considered groundbreaking research or not, jumping the gun is a bad idea.
> I am not qualified to make a judgement here, the point is following the process is better than jumping the gun on principle.
Why? The process is quite obviously net negative; we'd get better results with no process at all.