From the docs:
> ZeroFS fetches object data in 128 KiB parts
Read/write operations in object storage are _far more_ expensive than stored bytes. I'm always afraid of anything that abstracts over S3/GCS access specifically for that reason.
Especially that the “one fetch” is who knows how many reads and retries under the hood.
[dead]
One of the reasons why ZeroFS seems interesting is they use SlateDB under the hood, which optimizes the requests that hit S3 behind the scenes.