> I think it will be second nature to ask "how did you arrive at the code".
What about “Do you understand the code well enough to argue about it, its past, and possible evolution paths”?
I think that would be implied by "how did you arrive at the code". I think the conversation will revove around how did you "guide" things.
I think that would be implied by "how did you arrive at the code". I think the conversation will revove around how did you "guide" things.