logoalt Hacker News

Avicebronyesterday at 10:59 PM4 repliesview on HN

> The most efficient way to fund ambulance services would simply be to pay for the option the way that options are normally paid for: with a premium, collected from everyone the service stands ready to rescue. That’s how it’s done in the rest of the rich world. Some places, like the United Kingdom or Japan, simply fund ambulance services directly out of taxes; others, like the Australian state of Victoria, sell memberships in “Ambulance Victoria,” with unlimited exercise at the cost of about $70 a year per family.

So there is a solution.


Replies

kaelwdtoday at 6:54 AM

> “Ambulance Victoria,” with unlimited exercise at the cost of about $70 a year

And even if you don't pay this it still isn't that expensive - US$12873 is more than a helicopter transport would cost here. US healthcare companies somehow get away with charging insured patients 10x more than civilised countries charge uninsured ones.

charcircuityesterday at 11:36 PM

>from everyone the service stands ready to rescue

So compelled health insurance to use an ambulance? You could just as well make it optional and charge people without the insurance the full price.

show 1 reply
paxysyesterday at 11:42 PM

But that’s socialism!

show 1 reply