logoalt Hacker News

beanjuiceIItoday at 1:10 PM3 repliesview on HN

I've had rust developers quite often..tell me that it's immoral to use a language that doesn't have memory safety


Replies

synergy20today at 3:31 PM

The "Rust Evangelism Strike Force" is so annoying and it becomes the major reason I don't want to have anything to do with the language, yes I know it's strange.

Almost all HN software related discussion will have some Rust folks saying 'yeah I have a rust project for that', or 'just write this in rust and it will be better', so annoying after seeing those each time, it's like the house-window sales guy keeps knocking my door every day and never goes away.

quotemstrtoday at 3:01 PM

Rust people: it's wrong to use a language that lacks memory safety and modern developer affordances. Do you really want to spend time debugging crashes and foist security problems on your users?

Me: You're right. Java has come a long way. Let's download...

Rust: No! No no on. Not like that!

---

Memory safety is a worthwhile goal, but combining it with manual memory management is wrong for most tasks. Just use a damn GC. Rust's safety-plus-malloc niche should be much smaller than it is.

show 2 replies
darigtoday at 1:36 PM

[dead]