> seems that it is exploiting a clever trick that somehow all the experts missed.
Exactly, "clever". Isn't that the whole point?
A clever trick is way better than a stupid trick yeah. I don't get complaining about a concise elegant solution either unless a specific problem with the actual proof was brought up.
A clever trick is way better than a stupid trick yeah. I don't get complaining about a concise elegant solution either unless a specific problem with the actual proof was brought up.