logoalt Hacker News

alightsoultoday at 12:30 PM1 replyview on HN

They post this and then say it's too dangerous to make open source. this is proof that in reality it's To protect their market position


Replies

dannywtoday at 12:35 PM

Have OpenAI been on a crusade of "too dangerous to open source" recently? They've pivoted their more to messaging to "competitive reasons" recently, which I appreciate, because it's honest.

FWIW, Gemma4 31B is already quite a capable cyber/security model; do some post-training with RL gyms on it focused on cyber tasks and harnesses for a week or two, and on the specific domain of security/vuln-finding/pen-testing, you'll end up with an extremely capable frontier-cyber model that's entirely under your control at a shocking 31B.

Because securing your codebase, or securing your company's codebase is critical, and I consider it both an ethical and professional responsibility as a developer. It shouldn't depend on whether a classifier fires or not.