alt Hacker NewsThe Economics of Recursive Self-Improvement [pdf]
Comments
> But our models make it clear that such an [intelligence] explosion may not follow if there are diminishing returns (“ideas become harder to find”) or if feedback loops become bottlenecked.
RSI isn't anything new though; computers have been used to make computers better for about 80 years now.
Imagine having a secretary who could read 1 million records and give you back your answer in 100 microseconds, for just 10 cents an hour. That's Postgres.
So I'd imagine that if R&D can be automated, everything becomes better and cheaper but we'd all lose our jobs, as secretaries did to postgres. UBI season
First thing I thought when reading the title was "is this about those never ending self-help books?"
NB this is about AI, not about improving your self
I love that Sci-Fi fan-fiction is having a moment <3
Notice: viXra.org only accepts scholarly articles written without AI assistance. Please go to ai.viXra.org to submit new scholarly article written with AI assistance or rxiVerse.org to submit new research article written with or without AI assistance.
When I hear recursive self improvement all I remember are the ridiculous articles a few years ago about how 3d printers were going to make themselves and take over the world.
No DOI?
>Best evidence in favor of acceleration:
It's important to recognize that LLMs accelerating development of LLMs does not imply it will lead to self-sustaining acceleration.
[dead]
[flagged]
Reminder that while there are many naysayers who have been on the wrong side of AGI development progress the last decade…
There are two $1T companies who are all-in on RSI internally right now. They are supported by $20T of market cap plowing R&D into their efforts. You can think it’s dumb money at your own peril, however the market rewards intelligent allocation…
"We make a tentative calibration of the self-sustaining ac celeration condition using the existing data that is available, measuring AI capabilities using the Epoch Capabilities Index (Ho et al., 2025).
We find that the condition is met if a one-unit increase in AI model capabilities results in at least 15% higher AI R&D pro ductivity.
A rough back-of-the-envelope calculation based on reported AI engineer uplift suggests this return has been around 9% since the launch of coding agents.
This number is below the model-implied threshold, suggesting we are not experiencing a self-sustaining acceleration."
And the source of this data seems to be self-reported productivity gains from surveys: 1.4–2X in METR’s survey of technical workers (Becker, 2026).
A bit flimsy basis but an interesting paper nonetheless.