logoalt Hacker News

onlyrealcuzzotoday at 2:34 PM6 repliesview on HN

Zig's incremental builds are DEFINITELY a killer feature. In the short term, I could see why you'd make a switch to get it. But, in the medium term, can we really not expect to see this in Rust in the somewhat near future?

I want to go fast, but I don't want to go fast just to shoot my foot off.

If only somehow we could get Rust's safety with all of Zig's features and Go's runtime without GC...

That's what I'm working on building [=


Replies

insanitybittoday at 4:27 PM

Rust's compile times will get faster long before Zig gets safer.

show 1 reply
dabinattoday at 4:04 PM

This is being worked on: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/roadmap-...

Most of the goals on this page are targeted for this year.

Hinriktoday at 3:08 PM

Layperson here: what is special about Go's runtime, aside from the GC?

show 4 replies
lioeterstoday at 3:15 PM

Instead of waiting for faster compiler in Rust, how about from the other direction, adding some kind of borrow checker to Zig? That sounds more within reach and practically achievable, possibly even in userland.

show 3 replies
dnauticstoday at 3:26 PM

> if only somehow we could get Rust's safety with all of Zig's features

i periodically throw my unused codex tokens at this:

https://github.com/ityonemo/clr