logoalt Hacker News

LPisGoodyesterday at 9:04 PM3 repliesview on HN

Regular music videos (including the writing/recording) can easily go into 6 figures. I wonder what the $200,000 AI music videos looks like.


Replies

lwklyesterday at 9:26 PM

But why spend the same amount of money on AI instead of humans? My guess is that shooting a music video is probably fun for a lot of artists. And with AI the result is not predictable and might be inconsistent in the dumbest ways.

My guess is that an AI music video would have to be a lot cheaper for artists to consider it outside of making one just because you want to make an AI music video.

show 1 reply
jrflowersyesterday at 10:54 PM

Exactly the same

echelonyesterday at 9:12 PM

You don't need to spend $200k, because results can be bad for cheap.

https://youtu.be/HDdsKJl92H4

Though we're finding the studios contracted to do this can bill $50k. I know several studios that previously billed clients six figures for ad campaigns (P&G, HBO, pharma, etc.) are now charging five figures and winning a lion share of the bids now.

Not sure why Wan is the focus of this article and Seedance is a footnote. Wan/LTX/open models are significantly behind Chinese closed source models. (And the Chinese have left the Western models in the dust.)

I wouldn't do anything production grade in Wan.

show 1 reply