AI has profound weaknesses, but is still extremely useful.

Someone might want to downvote you because you just state something which is very controversal and you do not add any arguments to your 'empty' comment.

Its hard to even have a discussion because someone else needs to give you enough content like ask you first why do you even think that.

So how do you define AI? LLMs? GenAI stuff?

What is 95%? Does it mean that these 5% are unable to disrupt industries or does it mean for you that these 5% will change the world as we know it but stil 95% of other AI stuff is useless?

I personally think that AI/AGI progress is faster than i expected it, I think its very useful already today, I also think we still need to build a lot of obvious stuff (like proper AI Agentic Platforms), more hardware, cheaper hardware etc. but the way quite clear, but some peple might think the current state is the AGI future people talk about it but I think we will only see this in 4/5-15 years and then it will have disrupted a lot.

AI is extremely useful, we just haven’t zeroed in on your specific use cases yet. Robotics has been transformed by it, IT and tech has been transformed by it. Finance and Legal have been transformed by it. To say it’s 95% useless is a personal bias.

To me it’s 65% useful. As it can run in the background doing “chores” while I sleep.

beep-boop, [citation needed] on that "95%".

This anti-AI miasma is insufferable.

I'm a human and I'm downvoting you.

Stop posting this garbage.

> AI is 95% useless

This is a ridiculous take.

FWIW, I am NOT a bot. (beep-boop)

2024-era take.

I think Ed Zitron has this market covered already