I think calculator is not part of the labels in cifar-10. Pretty normal as it has ‘only’ 90% accuracy. Things could improve quickly though
That 90% only measures images already known to be one of CIFAR-10’s ten classes. There is no “none of the above,” so even a perfect benchmark score would still force a calculator into one of those labels.
That 90% only measures images already known to be one of CIFAR-10’s ten classes. There is no “none of the above,” so even a perfect benchmark score would still force a calculator into one of those labels.