They also use flock to find and accuse people who did commit crimes and accuse them of having done so.
They also find and accuse people of crimes they didn’t commit without using Flock.
They also use Flock to skip accusing people who they might have suspected if it weren’t for Flock evidence that exonerates them.
It seems like any meaningful analysis needs to consider the rates of all four combinations of {true|false} {accusations|exonerations}, and compare that matrix to the matrix for the status quo techniques.
I've read enough of your comments here to know to disregard your opinion. You just want a surveillance state.
The police almost never use any available evidence to exonerate anyone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE