The surprising (and possibly untrue) thing is the high price of canned vulnerabilities. WordPress is known as the remote root shell with a blogging feature.
Propably untrue, the only way to know is to do threat intelligence, and inflitrate those telegram groups where these brokers operate, I doubt the writer of the article did that. Maybe he conflated any vulnerability with a 0-day one?
WordPress is one of the most hardened targets of all time
that obsolete code did not change for decades. all the bugs have been discovered and patchedsome statistics point to almost 50% of all websites on the internet running on Wordpress, $500k for an undisclosed 0day unauthenticated RCE doesn't seem so unrealistic to me
I still don't understand why, for a blog, a static page isn't enough - especially since most of the WordPress issues are "solved" by adding caching.
I do understand it from an user perspective (it's easier to tell the average user to drag and drop rather than committing to a GitHub repo and letting hugo build the website), but from a security standpoint WordPress is really just waiting for a vulnerability (either in the core or on the thousands of plugins) in order to unlock its RCE-as-a-service functionality.