alt Hacker NewsIn must be noted that it should parse as (avoid (success at all costs)), not (avoid success)(at all costs).
That is, losing integrity for the sake of success is what's to be avoided, not success itself.
In must be noted that it should parse as (avoid (success at all costs)), not (avoid success)(at all costs).
That is, losing integrity for the sake of success is what's to be avoided, not success itself.
I appreciate this clarrification comment: had originally read this as option B and was wondering "why would they say this?"