logoalt Hacker News

waveformstoday at 3:11 AM5 repliesview on HN

The removal of FM radio from cell phones was a big mistake. It should never have allowed. Radio is very useful in emergencies.

Lately I have been getting back in to internet radio, mostly via Elisa in KDE. Here is my favorite internet stream: https://hawaiireggaenetwork.com/


Replies

inigyoutoday at 11:35 AM

If you mandate FM for this reason what else will you mandate? Morse code scanning for SOS?

Cellphones got cellphone emergency broadcasts before they lost FM radio, so they still show emergency broadcasts.

show 2 replies
JuniperMesostoday at 3:37 AM

I don't think I ever used the FM feature on my phone, except purely to test out whether it worked. I wouldn't make phone purchasing decisions based on whether or not it had a FM radio. A regulation requiring it in the ostensible name of safety would make phones somewhat more expensive and I'm skeptical that it would even help improve safety in an emergency significantly.

show 4 replies
lesosteptoday at 3:52 PM

If I remember correctly, wasn't that because you can't fit proper antenna into the phone?

Something-something antenna 1/4 of the wavelength physics. And FM wave is roughly 3 meters long.

When people carried antennas (headphone cords) around it was handy, but not a lot of people would carry antenna now

m463today at 5:06 AM

I have a car with it - even HD - and I thought I would use it more.

But every time I try it out, the stations are playing a loud advertisement.

user2722today at 6:32 AM

Agree. The only problem about radio is requiring wired headphones to serve as antenna.

Do flagship Snapdragon SOCs still have radio? Thinking about next GOS compatible Motorola-branded device, the first device GOS will support with Snapdragon.

show 1 reply