logoalt Hacker News

quotemstryesterday at 9:16 AM3 repliesview on HN

It is, though. Why should I not be able to agree, with sufficiently informed consent, to route traffic through a connection I operate via a computer I own using software I've chosen of my own free will to install?

What's the difference between running a Tor exit node and a "residential proxy" except optics?

Look: I'm 100% for banning secret proxies that hide from the user, but stopping people knowingly and voluntarily running these proxies is a violation of fundamental software freedom tenets.


Replies

ozlikethewizardyesterday at 9:50 AM

The difference is the user. Your average smart TV user doesn't know what a residential proxy is, hell who's installing/playing the games but children? Consumer regulation to protect consumers from a knowledge disparity that leads to uninformed consent isn't a bad thing imo.

show 1 reply
account42yesterday at 10:19 AM

We're not talking about people voluntarily installing proxies, we're talking about proxies piggy backing on apps that are marketed for an entirely different purpose.

show 1 reply
windwardyesterday at 9:41 AM

It all comes back to this. I pay for the network, I'm liable for it: I decide what comes through it.