logoalt Hacker News

petilonyesterday at 7:36 PM3 repliesview on HN

I disagree that LLM models are the product of enormous quantities of copyright infringement.

The recent announcement that AI-assisted research produced a counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture--a long-standing open problem in algebraic geometry--shows the original value AI can create. The result was not copied from a textbook; it emerged from AI learning from existing material, much as a human does, and then applying that knowledge in a new way. If that's a violation of copyright, then a human doing the exact same thing would be a copyright violation too. But it isn't.


Replies

InsideOutSantayesterday at 8:34 PM

If you re-read your comment, you will find that your second paragraph is not evidence for the claim you make in your first paragraph. In fact, your first paragraph is just false.

show 1 reply
butlikeyesterday at 7:43 PM

Yup if a machine kills a human it's not the machine's fault; it's the human's. Humans doing the exact same thing as machines aren't 1:1.

show 1 reply
ilovecake1984yesterday at 7:40 PM

The didn’t pay for the books.

It’s massive copyright infringement.

The human buys the books.

show 2 replies