alt Hacker NewsIs the OP the author of this? Because they are writing responses here that are unquestionably unedited LLM generated responses. The project looks cool, and I'm particularly glad to see a reach for a p2p container registry, but that sort of behavior doesn't lend credibility to something as critical as image infrastructure.
Replies
It looks like OP only has an account here to self-promote, which also puts them in the same credibility tier as an advertiser.
I hate how I feel about this: the sole contributor's account is not 2 month old, and yet they have created an org for this project, with all the bells and whistles in the README.
To me, a project that young, with a unique developer at the helm, cannot look "that nice", so I can't resist seeing it as too nice to be true, and being actually a scam or whatever.
I know that, thanks to AI, a solo dev can not only orchestrate an actual projects in a few days, but can ALSO take time to make a good looking README.
When, in the past, the focus was first on the code, then on the README.
Unrelated: I clicked your user profile and wondered what that keybase.io thing was... turns out your proof expired and should no longer be trusted. :P
"That identity proof for <name> is pending, revoked, or non-existent".