logoalt Hacker News

belochtoday at 7:30 PM4 repliesview on HN

Autonomous driving is still nowhere near 100%, so why suddenly jump to fighter jets? Is this more of Hegseth's foolhardy bluster and injected testosterone? The tech isn't ready. They should start with golf-karts, not fighter planes.

-----------

Edit: Okay gang. If aircraft are easier to fly than cars are to drive, where are all your pilot licenses? If you've faced rush hour traffic, flying a military jet should be a breeze! Please, go volunteer your neighbourhoods to be the first for AI jets to be tested over. We can put a mock enemy target in an empty lot and watch them pick it off, first try, with zero collateral damage. Easy peasy!


Replies

syrrimtoday at 7:43 PM

Fighter jets don't need 100%. In a war, we accept a much higher rate of casualties than we do in day to day driving. I would also imagine that while planes are harder for a person to pilot, they are easier for a computer. Most of what makes them hard is mechanical, not dealing with unexpected situations.

serftoday at 7:32 PM

I reject the notion that planes are harder to automate.

Lord-Jobotoday at 7:31 PM

There are many ways that flying is an easier solve than driving, believe it or not.

ge96today at 7:31 PM

Planes might be easier, large empty space in the sky