logoalt Hacker News

ModernMechyesterday at 11:24 AM3 repliesview on HN

If it's so evident, why can't someone prove it with something more than "it seems better and everyone agrees"?


Replies

simonwyesterday at 1:07 PM

Have you ever seen evidence of a productivity improvement that you have found convincing for any software tool, independent of LLMs?

What shape did that evidence take?

show 1 reply
StilesCrisisyesterday at 12:30 PM

You think the world is lacking in LLM benchmarks?

show 1 reply
AnimalMuppetyesterday at 7:22 PM

Con: "Where's the evidence that this actually is improving productivity?"

Pro: "The evidence hasn't shown up in statistics yet; it's too new!"

Con: "And won't this destroy maintainability?"

Pro: "Show me the maintainability disasters caused by AI."

Con: "I can't yet; it's too new!"

Both sides are playing the "it's too new" card when asked for actual evidence to prove their claims. In fairness, it actually is too new for there to be much statistically-valid data, especially if the inflection point was November 2025. So both sides are trumpeting their position, neither with actual trustworthy data.

Everybody has their anecdote. Nobody has data yet.