You can find an extremely similar paragraph written about Claude 4.x or some equivalent gpt

Yes, as a product gradually improves there will always be many people for whom version X didn't work well for them and version X+1 does. It turns out that Opus 4.5 and GPT 5.1 were larger than average improvements that cross that threshold for a significant number of people.

My point is these things only get truly better in anecdotes. The ways in which they fail is yet to change.

If your claim is that there's no substantive difference between Sonnet 3.5 and Fable, then we live in very different worlds.