I'm dismayed that I had to scroll past so many cynical cheap shots to find a comment that actually addresses the core point. I have yet to hear a single compelling plan for how we will prevent bioweapon development or massive hacking campaigns. For those who are skeptical of Dario's motives here, it's not enough to call out apparent hypocrisy, you need to suggest an alternative plan that addresses these concerns.
> I had to scroll past so many cynical cheap shots
I haven't read cynical comments, just ones pointing out that the article is cynical itself.
> addresses the core point
No it doesn't address anything, it is fear mongering question.
> I have yet to hear a single compelling plan for how we will prevent bioweapon development or massive hacking campaigns
Me neither, I just see marketing campaigns trying to raise valuation of a pre-IPO company.
> you need to suggest an alternative plan that addresses these concerns
I suggest that Dario stops writing marketing letters and start organizing a mostly neutral expert organization to propose solutions.
Also notice that as EU citizen I don't trust a US pre-IPO company's CEO with conflict of interest to suggest solution on resolving global security matters. Especially since he admittedly has no control over how the technology of his own company is deployed in global conflicts[1]
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/06/10/ant...