logoalt Hacker News

JuniperMesostoday at 6:41 PM2 repliesview on HN

The classical cipher component is additonal complexity in the protocol and maybe some meaningful amount of additonal time to compute and key data to store/transmit, is it not? I can see why we'd like to avoid effectively encrypting the same data twice with different protocols, one of which is known to be vulnerable to quantum computer based attacks.


Replies

vrightertoday at 7:16 PM

good thing quantum computers that can factor numbers have never been built. No number was ever really factored without cheating, the actual shor's algorithm has never been implemented. And we're not really any closer to

show 1 reply
quotemstrtoday at 7:40 PM

Classic ciphers are damn fast and small compared to PQC. If you're doing PQC anyway, doing classical cryptography at the same time has negligible cost.

That makes attempts to push PQC-only modes super suspicious to me. Smells like Dual_EC_DRBG.