Blockchain.

the same way they currently enforce authors own all copyright in their contributions, via the contributor agreement (OCA). in the real world, people aren’t going to intentionally sneak in LLM-authored code and potentially be legally liable.

Best effort, just like in the case of existing contributor agreements that demand you to be the copyright holder.

Or like in the case of checking that free range eggs are in fact free range eggs.

Or like in the case of Steam demanding AI disclosure, to the dismay of Tim Sweeney ...

Let's hope the dismay increases over time.

Subjectively; as 100% of all laws and rules throughout history have been enforced.

> How do you enforce this?

It's not impossible - right now there are all these low-effort PRs. If the PR is indistinguishable from a normal human-written PR, that addresses some of their concerns.

In any case, a rule or policy that can be worked around is not a reason to do away with that rule or policy.

I mean, if we only ever catch 10% of murderers, do you really think it is reasonable to remove that law from the books?

As best as you can. I don't know why people keep asking this question, when the answer is obvious and exactly like all other contribution policies.

In this case, this is coming from Oracle, which holds the OpenJDK purse strings, so being found in violation is also likely to have financial consequences for the violator.