logoalt Hacker News

aborsyyesterday at 8:20 PM2 repliesview on HN

It does too many things, and the product has got too complex. I saw a year ago they were looking for someone just to help with complexity.

I use it but feel uncomfortable, that it has large attack surface and LLMs will find exploits in it.

Without taillock it makes no sense. Anyone on their coordination servers will be able to connect to your network.


Replies

r0b05yesterday at 9:02 PM

The large attack surface is a good point. I started using it initially and the ease of setting up a vpn was nice, but then I came across few security vulnerability postings which led to concern so I went to Wireguard. I think they should reign in the features and treat it as a secure vpn first and foremost and remove unnecessary features to minimize the attack surface.

show 2 replies
k8sToGoyesterday at 8:43 PM

> I use it but feel uncomfortable, that it has large attack surface and LLMs will find exploits in it

Doesn't this apply to any application you use? How would it be different with plain wireguard?

show 1 reply