> if I hired a professional artist to draw a picture of a pelican riding a bicycle,
I think AI folks have done a terrible job of communicating this, but replacing a professional simply isn't the point. The point is to serve all the situations where people would've never considered hiring a professional, and where perfection or artistic merit isn't the point (say a personal throwaway recreation of an LOTR world).
And I think in that regard the benchmarks are pretty good.
> replacing a professional simply isn't the point.
I'm not saying it is, just that there's obviously still room for the models to improve on this task.
IMHO the output is bad enough that I can't imagine a use case for illustrations of this kind.