> "probably only 20% chance we all die"

Bad news for you -- there's a 100% chance we all die. Sorry to be the one to tell you.

What makes you think separate nations would effectively cooperate in this way?

Your 'serious' proposal is unlimited global military bombing campaign on civilian infrastructure by the United States (which is currently losing a war using the same strategy) to 'solve safety' preemptively against a 20% number you just made up?

And you accuse the 'other side' of 'suicidal apathy'??

You should put down the AI and do some self-reflection on how you came to hold these views.

No.

You’re not necessarily wrong, but math proofs aren’t going to unify today’s brainrotted population.

> We are now at the point where RSI is feasible

  What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

There are some genuinely insane takes in this thread on both sides but this takes the cake.