logoalt Hacker News

bluGillyesterday at 6:17 PM2 repliesview on HN

It isn't just the cost to collect, it is also the cost to store. Heat is easy and safe to store at just above room temperature in rocks - but you need a lot of rocks. Just to heat my house for a few days would need tons of rock at temperatures I'd allow in my house (I have kids and so I worry they will open the rock container and get burnt). Rocks are not free. You can also use water for storage, but again you have the issue needing a tank (and water is a drowning hazard, plus the worry about leaks...)


Replies

danansyesterday at 11:08 PM

> Just to heat my house for a few days would need tons of rock at temperatures I'd allow in my house (I have kids and so I worry they will open the rock container and get burnt). Rocks are not free

Sand/rock heat storage is for industrial and utility scale application, not your house.

> You can also use water for storage, but again you have the issue needing a tank (and water is a drowning hazard, plus the worry about leaks...)

Tank heat pump water heaters are available and can already do load shifting on a daily basis (using off peak cheaper and cleaner electricity). I have one and it works great, and I guarantee it isn't a drowning hazard.

There are versions of these systems that can store enough heat to heat a house, not just provide hot water at the tap.

markvdbyesterday at 8:51 PM

Square cube law will optimise heat storage. These Finnish sand based heat batteries are a prime small-scale example.