logoalt Hacker News

kstenerudlast Wednesday at 8:58 AM3 repliesview on HN

You could actually use SIMD instructions to detect sequences of bytes with the top bit cleared, thus allowing bulk copies of ASCII text without a per-byte loop.

Another optimization would be to take advantage of the fact that codepoint usage tends to cluster around the language of the text. So if you detect usage of 3-byte encodings, chances are you'll continue encountering only 3-byte encodings, with the odd ASCII or emoji codepoints. This opens up even more state machine possibilities.


Replies

duskwuffyesterday at 8:54 PM

> So if you detect usage of 3-byte encodings, chances are you'll continue encountering only 3-byte encodings, with the odd ASCII or emoji codepoints.

Depends on what kind of text you're processing. Many languages use the ASCII range for spaces/newlines, digits, and punctuation.

show 1 reply
vlovich123yesterday at 10:40 PM

FWIW I believe the second optimization is at odds with the first. It’s really hard to do this kind of conditional historical check in SIMD.

show 1 reply
zX41ZdbWyesterday at 9:45 PM

This is one of the optimizations from ClickHouse - detect ASCII and go a fast path: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/6cde32de1a2463...