logoalt Hacker News

canes123456today at 5:10 PM5 repliesview on HN

A public benefit corp shouldn’t be a start up. The primary goal of a start up is to grow as quickly as possible which is rarely benefits the public.

Very silly to call every non start up a lifestyle business. It’s just a business. Start up are the weird thing that almost always an obscene waste of time and money, but sometime creates google.


Replies

kube-systemtoday at 6:19 PM

A PBC is not a charity or a non-profit. PBCs are for-profit businesses with the goal of making money. In day-to-day business they're indistinguishable with other for-profit corporations, including fundraising and investment. The only real practical difference is that they give directors a little more leeway in their fiduciary duties to say "no" to doing evil things.

The advantage to a PBC is protecting founders from a serious problem with standard corporations: you might bring on investors who could subsequently demand you pollute, exploit people, and/or do other immoral activities for profit. You don't have to do these things to grow a business quickly.

show 1 reply
perfmodetoday at 10:12 PM

Anthropic is a PBC.

mgfisttoday at 6:16 PM

> The primary goal of a start up is to grow as quickly as possible which is rarely benefits the public.

Why is that so? Fast growth, when achieved honestly, is a result of solving user pain that others haven't. Maybe you think so because users != the public, but I think in totality the public is a collection of users who all have needs they want met.

show 1 reply
flakinesstoday at 5:22 PM

Fair point. Their page doesn't list any investors.

show 1 reply