This is the opposite of the truth. For instance:
https://www.wglt.org/local-news/2026-08-04/dekalb-and-aurora...
No, it's exactly the truth:
https://www.ncsl.org/fiscal/subsidizing-servers-how-states-a...
The legislatures are betting that the data centers stick around or bring in jobs. They won't. They think something that expensive must require a ton of jobs to maintain. It doesn't. They need low taxes, cheap land, cheap water, and cheap power.
How is spending $24 million a year on taxes not evidence that they lobbied, and received tax breaks and exemptions?
The reason they picked that location was because they get reduced rates.
50% off energy taxes.
Reduced property taxes.
I could go on.
https://siteselection.com/how-illinois-built-a-dream-home-fo...
Unless your arguing an example of a data centre that only received a tax break rather than exemption?