You're missing the point. Towns come out ahead when the people living there come out ahead. I'm not arguing with your math, but your math is also a straight line to a town with no people at all being better. Towns are for _people_.
It's for the people if they are stuck with a negative tax base and no way out. You either expand tax base or shrink it.
A DC [can be] a good stop gap as it increases tax base for the city while not requiring additional services that cost tax dollars.
Either that, or everyone's property taxes go up.
It's for the people if they are stuck with a negative tax base and no way out. You either expand tax base or shrink it.
A DC [can be] a good stop gap as it increases tax base for the city while not requiring additional services that cost tax dollars.
Either that, or everyone's property taxes go up.