logoalt Hacker News

chasilyesterday at 6:48 PM1 replyview on HN

For everyone who says that the Alpha was a technically-superior CPU design that should have prevailed, I will draw attention to an interesting fact:

"According to Allen Baum, the StrongARM traces its history to attempts to make a low-power version of the DEC Alpha, which DEC's engineers quickly concluded was not possible."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrongARM

While AArch64 has been in the top supercomputer, a phone running on Alpha was not.

For this scalability problem, it deserved to die.


Replies

p_lyesterday at 8:19 PM

The issue was not that Alpha ISA was impossible to scale down.

The issue was that DEC lacked the resources to run a completely new microarchitecture design to target low-power platforms, and the failure was trying to push an extreme performance chip into low-power envelope instead of designing a new one.

AFAIK with ARM the difference is that they started with low-power underpowered chip and modified it to bring the performance up.

You'd have probably similar issues trying to make a phone using Fujitsu A64FX (the supercomputer ARM) into low-power chip.

show 1 reply