Interesting, this presents an meta for an early stage investor. Fund a company with a BS forecast based on your ability to make money on the claw back provisions.
You're never going to make money from that. By the time you're presented with the opportunity to use them, you're on the losing end.
I see it as a game where investors get a better deal than the founders wanted. There is a lot of innuendo on the "we're not really interested, unless there's more upside for us" and the founders are then under pressure to up forecasts.
I think the investors believe the business is sound. It's just a way to get it for a better price.
Of course, if the business is a unicorn, none of this applies.