logoalt Hacker News

kadobanyesterday at 11:47 PM2 repliesview on HN

Consensus is that there's no way he had a correct, general proof.

My personal guess is he figured out later that his proof was broken or limited and never got around to fixing it.


Replies

applfanboysbgontoday at 12:51 AM

The funny thing is that whether or not he had a proof, it was only definitively proved because he claimed he had a proof, so in a roundabout sense, he's still responsible for the theorem being proved. It's kind of crazy to think about your words carrying so much weight that somebody from hundreds of years in the future will dedicate (a significant portion of) their life to them.

show 2 replies
odyssey7today at 12:12 AM

We haven’t yet reached the era in which we’re allowed to know about the technique. The simple, intuitive proof will become available to us when the time is right.

show 2 replies