I don't get it. The skills and instruction try to make the answer more machine like on purpose.
Not humanising it...
People want the terse, matter-of-fact output. Not the conversational chatty verbose and bloated nonsense with gray words and jargon and terms like "blast radius"
The article lost me when it implied that verbose drivel is actually intrinsically superior rather than a way to hedge bets
Which people exactly?
The problem we have is a few large and expensive models are trying to be everything to everyone.