That is a wild claim. Every single quarterly meeting my company has with customers begins with redistributing the notes from the previous meeting, and "to-do" points are regularly referenced.
AI notes are a godsend, because instead of forcing one person to keep careful notes throughout, the meeting's host can quickly review, edit, and send out the minutes - a job that otherwise would literally take more time than the meeting, because one person spent the meeting just taking notes. The AI notes require careful review, and contain a lot of repetitive fluff, but all notes require review before distribution.
So, now you are aware that this is a normal thing in other companies.
> That is a wild claim.
Perhaps we can all agree that usage is very bimodal, between the people who refer to auto-notes constantly vs never?