the tricks never worked legally speaking. misleading labels stay misleading even if you have a trademark on that name and use it for years.
the problem is cases like this rarely go to court, and plaintiffs might run into a judge who literally doesnt believe consumer fraud is a thing if theres at least one possible non fraud interpretation no matter how unlikely it is.
the tricks never worked legally speaking. misleading labels stay misleading even if you have a trademark on that name and use it for years.
the problem is cases like this rarely go to court, and plaintiffs might run into a judge who literally doesnt believe consumer fraud is a thing if theres at least one possible non fraud interpretation no matter how unlikely it is.