logoalt Hacker News

XCSmeyesterday at 10:19 PM3 repliesview on HN

This is just temporary though, right?

With the benefit of LLMs already being proven, in a couple of years we will have vastly better hardware for inference I guess.

I feel like now hardware is stagnating a bit, because the software side has moved too fast for the hardware to catch up. Once we settle on some good, optimal software architecture for the models, dedicated hardware will easily increase throughout by 10x or 100x, for a fraction of the cost.

LLMs seems quite simple, maybe we'll be able to print/assemble at home our own chips with the desired models/weights.

Maybe we'll have model weights being shared like game cartridges.


Replies

dragonwriteryesterday at 11:04 PM

> This is just temporary though, right?

Well, everything—even human life on Earth—is just temporary, but RAM supply lagging centralized-AI-driven demand increases continuing to squeeze the consumer market may not be a short term phenomenon.

> LLMs seems quite simple, maybe we'll be able to print/assemble at home our own chips with the desired models/weights.

So, the solution to the RAM crunch is “everyone has their own home chip fab and deals with the raw material supply and hazardous waste disposal”?

I...don't imagine so.

show 1 reply
jmward01yesterday at 10:55 PM

I personally think of this like sorting algorithms. Quick sort does the same thing bubble sort does so why do we need quick sort? Pushing for efficiency drives innovation. It does this for many reasons but a big one is that putting a cap on a resource forces you to consider the others available and often you find that all it took was a little effort and suddenly the alternate path that looked a little worse is actually better than you realized.

This has a lot to do with how MCTS works BTW. The current best path is often only the current best path because a lot of investment has been sunk into it. If you were to put equal resources into a different path you may find that it was actually far better. It is just that the early rollouts favored the other 'best path' so you sunk a lot of resources into that one. We are very early in our exploration of LLM architecture. I highly doubt we are anywhere near the best path right now.

show 1 reply
sixothreeyesterday at 11:01 PM

I fear the future of local models will be controlled by governments. I feel like some time soon there's going to be a crackdown on what is available to download, what is hostable, and what is "acceptable". I partially suspect it has something to do with why 128 GB seems to be the most you can currently purchase for a single machine, despite the price.

show 1 reply