alt Hacker News> So then you need to explain ARC-AGI-3: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24621
I don't, we originally had the turing test which was designed to determine human intelligence by its ability to imitate us with natural dialogue, but we've since defeated that. I stated "to me" because it's my personal opinion on a definition whose goalpost will probably never stop being moved.
> Back 1996, EQP automatically solved the Robbins conjecture. But nobody concluded EQP was generally intelligent.
EQP doesn't have the 3 criteria I outlined, which were different than "solving a math problem"
You wrote:
> > It's the cumulative knowledge of all general human intelligence, baked into an artificial form, which can then use that knowledge to achieve novel goals.
But it (currently) can't solve puzzles like ARC-AGI-3 that children can solve.