logoalt Hacker News

Scion9066yesterday at 4:22 PM1 replyview on HN

A number of states already have laws preventing individuals from setting up ALPR. I can't image state or government officials that don't lready have those restrictions in place would allow the public to set up tracking of their movements for very long if someone did try to set up something crowd-sourced or easily searchable.

e.g.:

Arkansas: https://law.justia.com/codes/arkansas/title-12/subtitle-2/ch... > Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, it is unlawful for an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or the State of Arkansas, its agencies, and political subdivisions to use an automatic license plate reader system.

Maine: https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/29-A/title29-Asec2117... > Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a person may not use an automated license plate recognition system.


Replies

cmiles8yesterday at 6:37 PM

I doubt the use laws would stand up to much pressure if tested. It’s long established that a private citizen can film nearly anything on public streets, including filming the police and public officials. It’s a leap to suggest they can’t take that footage and then apply a license plate reader to the same footage. I doubt these laws would survive SCOTUS if tested.