You should go read the United States v Jones concurrence and try to figure out why five Justices disagree with you. Have some curiosity about the world!

You can also read Carpenter v United States for some background thoughts on why it's not as simple as Justice Fluidcruft condescendingly imagines it to be.

In fact if you're really curious, you could even look at the state cases that are bubbling their way up like Commonwealth v McCarthy.

If only everyone were as confident and simplistic as you, we could avoid all these darn cases :(