> But what's the problem then? Just use AI to fix it.

Even if that were feasible in a sustainable way (i.e. LLM-generated code wouldn't drown your code base in technical debt over the mid- to long term), the asymptotic end state of this is that the LLM provider owns the means of your production, not you anymore. How can anyone in their right mind run into this obvious trap?

> By the time you've untangled one bad decision, five more have been merged.

And then there's that. What's the value of all this "speed" when it destroys the most valuable thing you have?

> At some point, someone still has to know what is going on. And that's the most valuable person on the team.

The best you can do is see that you keep being one of those.