logoalt Hacker News

phireyesterday at 2:28 AM2 repliesview on HN

And personally, I'm not even sure it crosses that bar.

RISC-V somehow manages to be more fragmented than x86 (which is impressive), and just can't compete on instruction density.

I think a large part of the issue with RISC-V is that it predates (public knowledge of) ARMv8 by a year or two, so it couldn't use it as inspiration. If you compare RISC-V to 32-bit ARM, the comparisons are much more favourable.


Replies

Someoneyesterday at 8:11 PM

> think a large part of the issue with RISC-V is that it predates (public knowledge of) ARMv8 by a year or two

Does it? https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~krste/papers/EECS-2016-1.p... has a section on ARMv8 (section 2.5)

It says they became aware of it a year after they started the RISC-V project, but that’s five years before that paper was published.

show 1 reply
monocasayesterday at 2:49 AM

Everything I've seen is that rv64gc is very competitive with aarch64 wrt code density.

show 2 replies